🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently spent years building local support and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 decided to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The different conditions placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.