🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."